Get 1,000+ Free Secret Apps on Firestick & Android TV/Google TV

TV Channels

Google Play Store is a Monopoly – Judge Weighs In

Google Play Store is a Monopoly

A jury in December found that Google broke US antitrust laws through deals and billing rules that gave an unfair boost to its Android app marketplace, the Google Play app store.

This came after the creators of Fortnite, Epic Games, sued the tech conglomerate for restricting access to other app stores.

Google’s dominance over the Android ecosystem has led to a federal judge considering remedies that could drive the most consequential shakeup ever to Google’s control of the Android ecosystem. A judge expressed frustration with Google’s claims that any changes would be bad for consumers and other businesses, stating that Google as an “illegal monopolist” will have to pay some penalties.

Google Play Store’s Dominance over Android App Market

The Android app marketplace has long been dominated by the Google Play store, a reality that has posed significant challenges for developers and alternative app stores such as Aptoide TV. Google has required hardware companies that want to offer Google Play on their devices to agree not to work with or promote alternative app stores, effectively preventing most consumers from ever discovering these alternatives.

As a result, rival app stores such as those from Amazon and Samsung have struggled to persuade developers to list their apps outside of Google Play. Maintaining apps in multiple app stores can be an arduous task, as it requires extra work and resources from developers. This dynamic has solidified Google Play’s dominance over the Android app market.

In response to these concerns, Epic Games has proposed that Google be required to provide rival stores a way to list apps that are hosted on Google Play. This would allow people to browse alternative app stores without feeling they are missing out on popular apps, potentially reducing the app developer challenges associated with maintaining a presence across multiple platforms.

Google Play Store Monopoly

The jury’s verdict that Google broke US antitrust laws through its Google Play monopoly and restrictive app store billing rules has prompted a federal judge to consider how Google could be forced to change its business as a penalty.

The judge has expressed a desire to find a way to “reduce the friction” that users face when trying to download an app from an app store other than Google Play on Android devices. This is because Google’s operating system has initiated a series of warnings that bypassing Google Play could trigger security issues, potentially deterring people from following through with a download. Many Android TV users have likely come across this with the Play Protect warning that appears when sideloading applications.

The judge’s focus on addressing app distribution restrictions imposed by Google’scontrol suggests that significant changes may be in store for the tech giant’s long-standing dominance over the Android app marketplace. This ruling could mark a turning point in the ongoing battle over the power and practices of Google Play’s monopoly, potentially leading to a more competitive and consumer-friendly Android app ecosystem.

Google’s Defense of Android and Google Play

Google is vigorously defending its right to maintain a sustainable business model that keeps people safe, partners with developers and OEMs, and preserves the overall health and vitality of the Android ecosystem. The tech giant argues that the remedies proposed by Epic Games would undermine the privacy, security, and user experience for consumers, developers, and device manufacturers, going far beyond the scope of the recent U.S. trial verdict, which Google plans to challenge.

Google contends that its existing measures to protect user security and privacy, support developer business opportunities, and enable device manufacturer competition are essential to maintaining a healthy Android ecosystem. The company believes that the changes demanded by Epic Games would threaten the very foundations that have allowed the Android platform to thrive and provide benefits to all stakeholders involved.

Maintaining a sustainable business model, while ensuring the safety and privacy of its users, is a top priority for Google. The company asserts that its partnerships with developers and device manufacturers are crucial in driving continued innovation and growth within the Android ecosystem, which would be jeopardized by the proposed remedies. Google remains committed to vigorously defending its approach to managing the Android platform and the Google Play store, as it believes these measures are necessary to protect the interests of all participants in the ecosystem.

They laid all of this out in a response posted to the Google official Blog.

This story was originally published by which you can find below.

What do you think of the monopoly Google currently has with its Play Store? Let us know in the comment section below!

Be sure to stay up-to-date with the latest streaming news, reviews, tips, and more by following the TROYPOINT Advisor with updates weekly.

This Advisor provides all the best cord-cutting tips to get the most out of your favorite streaming devices and more. Click the link below to join the other 800,000 Advisor subscribers.


Your online activity is recorded by your government, Internet Service Provider, app/addon/IPTV devs and all websites through your identifying IP address

Your Current Identifying IP Address (digital fingerprint):

Stream anonymously by using Surfshark VPN


Surfshark backs their service with a 30-day money back guarantee

Use your account on unlimited devices & share with family members


Free TROYPOINT Advisor

This page includes affiliate links where TROYPOINT may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. Many times, visitors will receive a discount due to the special arrangements made for our fans. Learn more on my Affiliate Disclaimer page.

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for _Mike _Mike says:

    I wish I understood this, but I don’t. Shouldn’t news reports/headlines be more precise about how they report these stories?

    Android being a Google app in itself based on the Linux OS decides to have a thing called play store to push apps out on.
    Then through billing rules gave a boost to its Google Android app marketplace.
    How is this restrictive?

    The headline should reflect what they have done maybe?
    Can someone please debunk this gibberish?

Continue the discussion at


Avatar for TROYPOINT Avatar for _Mike

Save 86% on Surfshark VPN + 4 Free Months