Get 1,000+ Free Secret Apps on Firestick & Android TV/Google TV

TV Channels

Flawless IPTV Operators Sentenced to 30 Years in Prison

Flawless IPTV Prison Time

In a groundbreaking legal victory, the masterminds behind Flawless IPTV, the largest pirate service in the United Kingdom, have been handed lengthy prison sentences totaling 30 years. The recent court ruling sends a strong message to those involved in copyright infringement and signals a significant milestone in the ongoing fight against online piracy.

The successful prosecution was the result of an extensive joint operation between law enforcement agencies, internet service providers, and anti-piracy organizations. Their collective efforts brought down the illegal empire, which had been operating for years, providing unauthorized access to premium television content, including sports events, movies, and TV shows.

People all over the world are flocking to IPTV services due to their low price that includes thousands of live channels, pay per view sporting events, movies, and TV shows. There are literally thousands of IPTV services available on the Internet today with no signs of these illegal enterprises shutting down anytime soon.  Yes, this serves as a victory for copyright holders and media conglomerates but doesn’t even put a dent in the current IPTV industry.

Flawless IPTV Defendants

The defendants, Mark Gould, Steven Gordon, Peter Jolley, Christopher Felvus and William Brown were sentenced to more than 30 years in prison combined. A sixth defendant, Zak Smith, did not appear in court. These individuals were found guilty of multiple offenses related to copyright infringement, money laundering, and organized crime. The court recognized the gravity of their actions, which not only harmed copyright holders but also disrupted the legitimate pay-TV industry, leading to substantial financial losses.

Mark Gould, 36, played a pivotal role in orchestrating Flawless IPTV, emerging as the driving force behind the illicit operation. With an estimated share of the profits amounting to approximately £1.7 million, his involvement in the enterprise was deemed significant. The judgment delivered an unparalleled 11-year prison sentence, holding Gould accountable for his actions on two counts of conspiracy to defraud and contempt of court.

Steven Gordon also reaped substantial benefits from his involvement, with the prosecution estimating his share at approximately £1 million. His active participation in two counts of conspiracy to defraud and contempt of court resulted in a sentence of five years and two months.

Legal Disclaimer: TROYPOINT does not develop, operate, host, distribute, or administer any streaming application, add-on, website, or service. Furthermore, we cannot determine the legality of any streaming platform reviewed on this website. TROYPOINT specializes in educational tech reviews, tutorials, and news which is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The end-user is solely responsible for media accessed and TROYPOINT assumes that all visitors are abiding by copyright laws set forth within their jurisdiction. Users should only stream works not protected by copyright when using unverified streaming solutions.

With reported profits totaling £773,000, Peter Jolley played a notable role in the enterprise. As a result of his involvement in two counts of conspiracy to defraud and money laundering, he has been handed a sentence of five years and two months.

Christopher Felvus, while obtaining a comparatively modest share of £164,500, was still implicated in the illicit activities. His involvement in two counts of conspiracy to defraud resulted in a sentence of three years and 11 months.

Despite William Brown initially claiming his innocence and only earning a mere £15,000, his recent conviction on two counts of conspiracy to defraud has led to a sentence of four years and nine months.

Zak Smith, who reportedly generated less than £5,000 through his involvement with Flawless IPTV, was conspicuously absent from court proceedings, resulting in a warrant being issued for his arrest.

About The Case

Flawless IPTV had amassed a vast user base by offering a wide range of channels and on-demand content at significantly reduced prices. Through a sophisticated network of servers and websites, they facilitated the distribution of copyrighted material to subscribers across the country, luring them with the promise of exclusive access to premium content without any legal repercussions.

The prosecution’s case was strengthened by compelling evidence gathered during an extensive investigation. This included digital forensics, server seizures, financial records, and testimony from industry experts. The court was presented with a comprehensive overview of the defendants’ elaborate operation, leaving no doubt about their culpability.

During the trial, it became apparent that the operators of Flawless IPTV had accumulated substantial profits from their illicit activities. Money laundering charges were brought against them, revealing a complex web of financial transactions and offshore accounts designed to conceal the true extent of their earnings. Such practices underscore the link between piracy and organized crime, emphasizing the need for robust legal measures to combat this pervasive issue.

The court’s decision to impose a collective 30-year prison sentence serves as a stern warning to those involved in similar illegal ventures. It underscores the severity of intellectual property infringement and highlights the determination of authorities to dismantle such operations. The ruling also acknowledges the significance of copyright protection in safeguarding the rights of creators and fostering a fair and sustainable digital economy.

Industry experts and stakeholders have lauded the successful prosecution, hailing it as a major victory in the ongoing battle against online piracy. They believe that the outcome will act as a deterrent, dissuading potential pirates from engaging in unlawful activities while reinforcing the importance of legitimate content consumption.

In conclusion, the sentencing of the masterminds behind Flawless IPTV to 30 years in prison sends a resounding message that piracy will not be tolerated. This landmark case marks a significant milestone in the fight against online piracy and sets a precedent for future prosecutions. It serves as a reminder that copyright infringement has real-world consequences and that those who engage in such activities will be held accountable under the law.

This story was first reported by TorrentFreak.

How to Start an IPTV Business – Do Rewards Outweigh Legal Risks?


Your online activity is recorded by your government, Internet Service Provider, app/addon/IPTV devs and all websites through your identifying IP address

Your Current Identifying IP Address (digital fingerprint):

Stream anonymously by using Surfshark VPN


Surfshark backs their service with a 30-day money back guarantee

Use your account on unlimited devices & share with family members


Tell us what you think about this case in the comments section below.

This page includes affiliate links where TROYPOINT may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. Many times, visitors will receive a discount due to the special arrangements made for our fans. Learn more on my Affiliate Disclaimer page.

8 thoughts on “Flawless IPTV Operators Sentenced to 30 Years in Prison”

  1. William brown learned the hard way that a plea deal goes a long way. I’m only assuming he plead not guilty. Bc his little 15000 don’t compare to the others but got near the same amount of time to the few ahead of him except the “mastermind”.

  2. If theses 2 guys in Europe were making £1.7 million and £1.0 million respectively – that gives you a peek inside how much the “Industry experts and stakeholders” are making through their exorbitant costs. It’s because of their own greed that the legitimate cable services have jacked their prices up – to the point that those who have low incomes can’t afford to get these services – and that has more or less forced people to look for cheaper ways to be able to get them at all. It sounds like it’s all a battle over MONEY – and the claim of “infringed rights” is simply the vehicle they’re riding on to help them gain even MORE money that they believe would’ve been theirs IF these guys hadn’t got in their way. If the 2 guys who set up this IPTV service made £1.7 and £1 million EACH (with charging low fees) – how much more would those profits have equaled to the “Industry experts and stakeholders”? At what point does one have “enough” money – without fighting to gain even MORE money?

    1. It is all about the money. I spend 100$ a month just for the internet. I can’t afford cable at their prices. So it is all about the money.

  3. The sentences seem harsh when compared to those of executives of large corporations who have been convicted of crimes (Volkswagen comes to mind with their false mileage scam) or those tech corps that have gotten away with murder in silencing any opposition to liberal political views (no need to name them here).

  4. Where is this “fair and sustainable digital economy”? Never heard of such a thing! Quite the opposite actually! I’d call it unfair and excessively sustainable to keep the big money where it is!!

  5. Congratulations. Now unverified IPTV service pirates know what to do to prevent detection / prosecution in light of the high demand for this service and the price gouging by providers such as AT& T and Spectrum.

  6. Vernon Hesford

    The greedy people in the IPTV industry have got what they deserve. They are putting at risk the smaller services who are primarily just looking at servicing maybe 2 or 3 hundred people at low cost and not looking to make thousands never mind millions of$

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save 86% on Surfshark VPN + 4 Free Months