IPTV Operator Destroys Evidence & Pays $670K in Damages

A ‘top level’ IPTV operator must pay Sky $670,000 in damages after operating illegal streaming services and destroying evidence.

David Dunbar from County Wexford has agreed to pay Sky €480,000 ($670K USD) in damages after operating an illegal IPTV service since 2018. The broadcaster described Dunbar as a “top level” pirate who generated up to €450,000 annually from his operation.

Sky’s investigation began last November when investigators discovered social media accounts selling modified IPTV boxes. The case gained momentum after an anonymous tip from UK-based Crime Stoppers provided additional evidence against Dunbar’s activities.

Court Orders Go Ignored

The situation escalated dramatically when Sky obtained an Anton Piller order in May 2025. This rare court order allows investigators to search premises and seize evidence before it can be destroyed. However, Dunbar refused to cooperate with the independent solicitor who arrived at his home.

Instead of complying, Dunbar reportedly destroyed evidence and moved frozen funds despite clear court instructions. These actions led Sky to file contempt of court charges that could result in prison time.

Evidence Destruction Backfires

Court documents suggest Dunbar had at least 1,682 customers, though Sky believes the actual number was much higher. The service offered annual packages priced at €80 and €100, generating substantial revenue over six years of operation.

Dunbar’s decision to destroy evidence rather than comply with court orders worked against him. Rather than defend the case, he consented to judgment, immediately losing the lawsuit and facing the full €480,000 damages claim.

Financial Impact Grows

Beyond the damages payment, Dunbar must cover Sky’s legal costs of approximately €100,000. Justice Mark Sanfey also granted permanent injunctions preventing Dunbar from ever operating another IPTV service.

The judge has reserved decision on whether to send Dunbar to prison for contempt of court. Sky’s legal team argued his actions represented “clear and knowing” contempt of multiple court orders.

Final Thoughts

Dunbar’s case serves as a stark warning to anyone involved in illegal streaming operations. The €580,000 total cost (including legal fees) shows how quickly financial penalties can mount when defendants refuse to cooperate with court orders.

With the contempt ruling still pending, Dunbar may face additional sanctions including possible imprisonment.